Special Education Reevaluation Report (RR)

Criteria Exemplary
(3 points)		 Proficient
(2 points)		 Unsatisfactory
(1 point)		 Student Feedback
 1. Teacher Candidate accurately summarizes the PK-12 student’s current physical condition, social and/or cultural background, and adaptive behavior from a variety of sources. 

Teacher Candidate accurately summarizes the PK-12 student’s current physical condition, social and/or cultural background, and adaptive behavior from all of the following sources: 

  • Previous evaluation report or reevaluation report
  • Previous IEP(s)
  • Teacher input
  • Parent input
  • Formal assessments
  • Classroom performance
  • Input from the school nurse or an outside medical professional. 

Teacher Candidate accurately summarizes the PK-12 student’s current physical condition, social and/or cultural background, and adaptive behavior from four or five of the following sources: 

  • Previous evaluation report or reevaluation report
  • Previous IEP(s)
  • Teacher input
  • Parent input
  • Formal assessments
  • Classroom performance
  • Input from the school nurse or an outside medical professional.

Teacher Candidate accurately summarizes the PK-12 student’s current physical condition, social and/or cultural background, and adaptive behavior from three or less of the following sources: 

  • Previous evaluation report or reevaluation report
  • Previous IEP(s)
  • Teacher input
  • Parent input
  • Formal assessments
  • Classroom performance
  • Input from the school nurse or an outside medical professional.
  
 2. Teacher Candidate properly interprets parent and teacher input. 

Teacher Candidate properly interprets parent and teacher input by including all of the following items: 

  • Documenting who provided, when, and how the input was received
  • Summarizing the input related to the PK-12 student’s academic performance
  • Summarizing the input related to the PK-12 student’s functional performance
    Summarizing the input related to the PK-12 student’s health and medical status

Teacher Candidate properly interprets parent and teacher input by including three of the following items: 

  • Documenting who provided, when, and how the input was received
  • Summarizing the input related to the PK-12 student’s academic performance
  • Summarizing the input related to the PK-12 student’s functional performance
    Summarizing the input related to the PK-12 student’s health and medical status

Teacher Candidate properly interprets parent and teacher input by including two or less of the following items: 

  • Documenting who provided, when, and how the input was received
  • Summarizing the input related to the PK-12 student’s academic performance
  • Summarizing the input related to the PK-12 student’s functional performance
  • Summarizing the input related to the PK-12 student’s health and medical status
  
 3. Teacher Candidate accurately analyzes the PK-12 student’s performance on standardized aptitude and achievement tests. 

Teacher Candidate accurately analyzes the PK-12 student’s performance on standardized aptitude and achievement tests by including all of the following items: 

  • Documenting who administered, when, and what standardized assessments were conducted
  • Reporting and interpreting the meaning of each standardized test result
  • Summarizing how the standardized test score results connect to the student’s special education services

Teacher Candidate accurately analyzes the PK-12 student’s performance on standardized aptitude and achievement tests by including two of the following items: 

  • Documenting who administered, when, and what standardized assessments were conducted
  • Reporting and interpreting the meaning of each standardized test result
  • Summarizing how the standardized test score results connect to the student’s special education services

Teacher Candidate accurately analyzes the PK-12 student’s performance on standardized aptitude and achievement tests by including one or none of the following items: 

  • Documenting who administered, when, and what standardized assessments were conducted
  • Reporting and interpreting the meaning of each standardized test result
  • Summarizing how the standardized test score results connect to the student’s special education services
  
4. Teacher Candidate accurately describes the PK-12 student’s performance on classroom-based, state, and local assessments. 

Teacher Candidate accurately describes the  PK-12 student’s performance on classroom-based, state, and local assessments through all of the following items: 

  • Documenting what classroom-based, state, and local assessments were administered and when
  • Reporting and interpreting the results of each classroom-based, state, and local assessment
    Summarizing how the results of the classroom-based, state, and local assessments connect to the student’s special education services. 

Teacher Candidate accurately describes the  PK-12 student’s performance on classroom-based, state, and local assessments through two of the following items: 

  • Documenting what classroom-based, state, and local assessments were administered and when
  • Reporting and interpreting the results of each classroom-based, state, and local assessment
  • Summarizing how the results of the classroom-based, state, and local assessments connect to the student’s special education services. 

Teacher Candidate accurately describes the  PK-12 student’s performance on classroom-based, state, and local assessments through one or none of the following items: 

  • Documenting what classroom-based, state, and local assessments were administered and when
  • Reporting and interpreting the results of each classroom-based, state, and local assessment
  • Summarizing how the results of the classroom-based, state, and local assessments connect to the student’s special education services. 
  
 5. Teacher Candidate adequately explains the PK-12 student's behavior in observable and measurable terms. 

Teacher Candidate adequately explains the PK-12 student’s behavior through all of the following items:

  • Documenting who collected the behavioral data, when, and how
  • Reporting and interpreting the results of the direct observational data
  • Identify how the results connect to the student’s special education services.

Teacher Candidate adequately explains the PK-12 student’s behavior through two of the following items:

  • Documenting who collected the behavioral data, when, and how
  • Reporting and interpreting the results of the direct observational data
    Identify how the results connect to the student’s special education services. 

Teacher Candidate adequately explains the PK-12 student’s behavior through one or none of the following items:

  • Documenting who collected the behavioral data, when, and how
  • Reporting and interpreting the results of the direct observational data
  • Identify how the results connect to the student’s special education services. 
  
 6. Teacher Candidate properly evaluates the influence of factors in the determination of the PK-12 student’s eligibility for special education and related services. 

Teacher Candidate properly evaluates the influence of factors in the determination of the PK-12 student’s eligibility for special education and related services by identifying all of the following items: 

  • Why there is or isn’t a lack of appropriate instruction in reading
  • Why there is or isn’t a lack of appropriate instruction in mathematics
  • Why there is or isn’t limited English proficiency 

Teacher Candidate properly evaluates the influence of factors in the determination of the PK-12 student’s eligibility for special education and related services by identifying two of the following items: 

  • Why there is or isn’t a lack of appropriate instruction in reading
  • Why there is or isn’t a lack of appropriate instruction in mathematics
  • Why there is or isn’t limited English proficiency 

Teacher Candidate properly evaluates the influence of factors in the determination of the PK-12 student’s eligibility for special education and related services by identifying one or none of the following items: 

  • Why there is or isn’t a lack of appropriate instruction in reading
  • Why there is or isn’t a lack of appropriate instruction in mathematics
    Why there is or isn’t limited English proficiency 
  
 7. Teacher Candidate properly recommends and reports if additional data is required. 

Teacher Candidate properly recommends and reports if additional data is required by completing all of the following items: 

  • Determine whether additional data is necessary or not, and why
  • Documenting what additional data was collected, who administered it, and when 
  • Interpreting the results of the additional data
    Summarizing how the results of additional data connect to the student’s recommended special education services.

Teacher Candidate properly recommends and reports if additional data is required by completing three of the following items:

  • Determine whether additional data is necessary or not, and why
  • Documenting what additional data was collected, who administered it, and when
  • Interpreting the results of the additional data
  • Summarizing how the results of additional data connect to the student’s recommended special education services.

Teacher Candidate properly recommends and reports if additional data is required by completing two or less of the following items: 

  • Determine whether additional data is necessary or not, and why
  • Documenting what additional data was collected, who administered it, and when 
  • Interpreting the results of the additional data
    Summarizing how the results of additional data connect to the student’s recommended special education services.